"As a result of investigations (...), it was established that it was a planned and executed by the alleged victim in order to get attention from his ex-partner action", said the PGJE.
Reliance said that in the statements of Dr. contradictions were detected with respect to the circumstances in which the facts alleged to have occurred.
The IMSS worker said that when he was deprived of his liberty was taken to a room with wooden walls and kept sedated with juices and injections; however, was ruled medically that women submit fingerprints venipuncture.
About the story that during the days of captivity he would have stolen a product of 14 weeks of gestation by the pubic area where a wound was observed clinically demonstrated that it would not have been possible because it was never pregnant; injury also did not reach the uterine cavity existed nor swelling or laceration of the cervix as a sequel to that he had practiced a vaginal curettage.
The opinion in psychology, presented the Prosecutor determined that this is a person with psychological disorders.
Dependence When the doctor explained the progress of the research and advice needed to establish that it was a sham fact, the complainant stated that he had indeed been an assembly to draw the attention of his former partner.
0 comments:
Post a Comment